I would consider the argument expressed in the essay about the school for homeless children very effective. The essay uses Logos, and pathos. While the author does have some effective details, she never really presents her credentials.
The appeal to logos is very well set up and covers most of the bases. The Toulmin system shows that the essay has a strong claim, a good set of reasons, as well as an effective warrant. In addition, the author accepts the possible rebuttals of her arguments opponents, and defuses those arguments with a very nice qualifier.
The appeal to pathos is even more powerful. The argument tries to get people to feel an attachment to these poor, downtrodden children. Examples abound about how without all the services that the school will provide, the children would be in a much worse position. From prostitution to busy streets to gangs, First place is needed to keep the kids safe and happy.
This argument is well written, well argued piece. The logical part of the essay is well written, and the author does a very good job of involving the audience’s emotions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It is nice that you say the essay demonstrates the Toulmin system. It would be nicer if you would have proved that in your blog.
Post a Comment